Monday, December 10, 2018

Municipal Court can stay DL suspension after DWI if appeal State v. Robertson228 NJ 138 (2017)


Municipal Court can stay DL suspension after DWI if appeal
 State v. Robertson228 NJ 138 (2017)
  The Crowefactors are not a good fit to assess license suspensions in driving while intoxicated (DWI) cases. Defendants who seek a new trial before the Law Division should be presumptively eligible for a stay of a driver’s license suspension. The State can overcome that presumption by showing that a stay would present a serious threat to the safety of any person or the community. If no conditions would mitigate that risk, the court should not stay the sentence. 
If a defendant is convicted of DWI by the Law Division, the defendant has the burden to justify a stay of a driver’s license pending appeal to the Appellate Division by demonstrating the three elements set forth in Rule 2:9-4. If a stay is granted, the court may impose appropriate conditions similar to those available after a defendant’s conviction in municipal court. Municipal court and trial judges should set forth reasons on the record when they rule on a stay motion.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.